Edward Morris

expert panel

For many executives, AI has already become part of the daily workflow. They use it to summarize reports, find information, draft emails and work through routine tasks. But familiarity with the tools can create a false sense of fluency—and make it harder to recognize the gap between using AI and knowing how to use it strategically.Microsoft research involving thousands of knowledge workers found that generative AI can reduce time spent on tasks such as writing, information retrieval and summarization. But those individual productivity gains do not automatically translate into changes in how organizations make decisions or operate. Research from McKinsey similarly finds that while AI adoption is widespread, most organizations are still struggling to turn it into significant enterprise-level impact.The challenge, then, is not simply getting leaders to use AI more. It is learning to recognize where AI can change the work itself—and developing the judgment to know when, where and how to make that change.So what does genuine AI fluency look like at the leadership level? Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank approach that question from different vantage points, spanning enterprise technology, research, finance, retail, design and AI implementation. Their experiences offer a closer look at what happens when leaders move beyond individual productivity and begin applying AI to decisions, workflows, business systems and organizational strategy.

expert panel

The machine says the patient is low risk. The veteran clinician says something feels wrong. The AI recommends cutting a workstream. The executive team knows that workstream is critical to a customer they are trying to win. The coding assistant produces perfectly functioning code—except it has quietly recreated a function that already exists somewhere else in the codebase.These aren't hypothetical scenarios. They are the kinds of moments leaders increasingly face as AI moves from experimentation into decisions that affect customers, employees, operations and the bottom line. Automatically trusting the machine ignores context, intuition and accountability. Automatically siding with the human can mean overlooking patterns and possibilities that AI can uncover. So what should happen when an AI system and an experienced human reach different conclusions?Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated community of leaders specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications—have encountered this tension firsthand across healthcare, manufacturing, software development, enterprise transformation, market intelligence and technology strategy. In the examples that follow, they share what happened when AI and human expertise diverged, how their teams responded and what those moments revealed about the roles each should play in high-stakes decision-making.