Skills
About
Goran Paun is Principal and Creative Director at ArtVersion®, a Webby-winning design consultancy and user experience agency. He leads work across brand systems, digital strategy, technology, and product design. For more than two decades, he has guided creative direction and technology decisions for mid-market companies, large enterprises, notable nonprofit organizations, and growing brands. His work centers on the intersection of design, technology, and human-centered thinking, helping organizations create digital experiences that are clear, credible, accessible, and built to make sense to the people who use them.
Goran Paun
Published content
expert panel
AI progress is often reduced to a leaderboard: a model scores higher on reasoning, coding or multimodal benchmarks, and the industry moves on to the next release. But benchmarks are snapshots of what a model can demonstrate under controlled conditions. They do not always capture what happens when increasingly capable models are connected to an organization’s data, software, physical environments and decision-making processes.The 2026 AI Index from Stanford HAI reports that frontier AI capabilities are advancing faster than many established benchmarks can measure, with some evaluations reaching saturation within months.Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank see a similar pattern from the front lines of enterprise AI, machine learning, robotics, cybersecurity, cloud technology and digital product development. They point to a broader question for business leaders: What are today’s most capable AI models beginning to do that could matter far more than benchmark gains suggest? Here, they explore the emerging capabilities they believe deserve closer attention—and what those developments could mean for the way organizations build products, make decisions and operate in the years ahead.
expert panel
When an AI system produces a disappointing answer, the first instinct is often to rewrite the prompt. Add more context. Give it an example. Spell out the rules. Try again. Sometimes that works—but there’s a point where prompt refinement becomes a way of avoiding the real problem. If an AI system still struggles after repeated rounds of instruction, leaders need to ask a different question: Is the prompt actually the bottleneck?That question matters because AI performance depends on far more than the words sent to a model. The quality and availability of data, the tools a system can access, the workflow surrounding it and the model’s own capabilities can all shape the result.For leaders, the challenge is knowing when to stop tweaking and start redesigning. If the problem is the way work gets done, the answer may be a new workflow. If the system lacks reliable information, better data may matter more. If the task requires actions or specialized capabilities, different tooling or a different model may be necessary. And sometimes the right answer is to rethink the product or process altogether. Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated group of executives and practitioners with expertise across machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications—share how they recognize those inflection points and what leaders can do when a better prompt is no longer enough.
expert panel
The AI industry has been celebrating increasingly capable demonstrations: a model beats a benchmark, an autonomous vehicle completes a route, an AI agent handles a task that once required a person. But a successful demonstration answers only one question: Can the technology work?Commercialization demands much harder answers: Can it work every day? What happens when it fails? Who is responsible? Can the surrounding operation absorb those failures? And do the economics still work when real customers are paying for the result? Nevada’s recent approval of robotaxi networks for Tesla, Waymo and Uber opens the door to thousands of autonomous vehicles operating commercially, and brings those questions into sharp focus.Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank bring perspectives from machine learning, enterprise technology, product management, data architecture, financial services, infrastructure, healthcare and design to this next stage of the AI conversation. Below, they examine what it takes to move beyond a working model and build a system that can withstand real-world complexity—from managing failures and infrastructure to earning regulatory and public trust, establishing accountability and making the economics work at scale.
expert panel
For many executives, AI has already become part of the daily workflow. They use it to summarize reports, find information, draft emails and work through routine tasks. But familiarity with the tools can create a false sense of fluency—and make it harder to recognize the gap between using AI and knowing how to use it strategically.Microsoft research involving thousands of knowledge workers found that generative AI can reduce time spent on tasks such as writing, information retrieval and summarization. But those individual productivity gains do not automatically translate into changes in how organizations make decisions or operate. Research from McKinsey similarly finds that while AI adoption is widespread, most organizations are still struggling to turn it into significant enterprise-level impact.The challenge, then, is not simply getting leaders to use AI more. It is learning to recognize where AI can change the work itself—and developing the judgment to know when, where and how to make that change.So what does genuine AI fluency look like at the leadership level? Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank approach that question from different vantage points, spanning enterprise technology, research, finance, retail, design and AI implementation. Their experiences offer a closer look at what happens when leaders move beyond individual productivity and begin applying AI to decisions, workflows, business systems and organizational strategy.
expert panel
For all the talk about AI making customer service faster and more personal, there is still a harder question to answer: Does the customer actually feel better served? An instant answer or perfectly timed recommendation may be useful, but usefulness is not the same as feeling understood. When a customer has a complicated problem, is frustrated or simply wants to talk to someone, efficiency can quickly become the problem.That tension is becoming more important as companies bring AI into more customer interactions. Customers are increasingly comfortable with AI when it saves time or effort, but many still expect a human option when the stakes are higher. The challenge then is figuring out how technology can remove friction without taking away the judgment, reassurance and connection that make good service feel like good service.In this article, members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated community of leaders specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications—explore that challenge from different angles. They discuss personalization and customer memory, where human involvement matters most, how AI can give employees more room for empathy, and how customer signals can shape better products. They also examine what it really means for AI to remember—and how leaders can tell whether an interaction leaves customers feeling understood, rather than simply processed.
expert panel
For executives leading AI transformation, one of the most important decisions is also one of the most difficult: deciding where sensitive data should be processed, stored and governed as artificial intelligence becomes part of the enterprise operating model. The architecture choices organizations make today will shape not only their ability to innovate, but also their ability to protect critical information, meet regulatory expectations and maintain trust.The challenge is that there is no single blueprint for secure AI adoption. Leaders must weigh competing priorities, including the speed and scalability of cloud platforms against the control and data sovereignty of private or hybrid environments, the need for strong governance against the risk of slowing innovation and the benefits of advanced AI capabilities against the responsibility to maintain visibility over how data is used. As AI systems create new layers of information through prompts, outputs, embeddings and logs, organizations must consider not only where data resides, but where it flows and whether they can control its entire lifecycle.Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank, a curated group of experts specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications, examine the most important trade-offs leaders should consider when designing AI architectures for sensitive or regulated data. They also identify common mistakes organizations are making, from focusing only on storage location to overlooking data derivatives, governance gaps and the operational capabilities required to manage AI responsibly. Because architecture decisions are no longer just technical choices—they are business decisions tied to risk, resilience and long-term value.
Company details
ArtVersion
Company bio
ArtVersion® is an independent creative agency and design consultancy focused on brand systems, UX/UI design, digital strategy, web design and development, product design, and launch support. Since 1999, the agency has partnered with private and public companies, notable nonprofit organizations, and large legacy enterprises to create digital experiences that are strategic, accessible, and aesthetically refined. ArtVersion’s team brings together research, creative direction, technology, and implementation expertise to help organizations align their brand, content, and digital platforms with business goals.