Pradeep Kumar Muthukamatchi

expert panel

As AI becomes inseparable from competitive strategy, executives are confronting a difficult question: Who actually owns AI? Traditional org charts, designed for slower cycles of change, often fail to clarify accountability when algorithms influence revenue, risk and brand trust simultaneously. Without oversight and clear ownership of responsibility, issues like “shadow AI” deployments that increase compliance and reputational risk can quickly get out of hand. To prevent this problem, executive teams are rethinking AI councils, Chief AI Officers and cross-functional pods as strategic infrastructure—not bureaucratic overhead. Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated group of leaders specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI deployment—argue that this structure matters, but not in the way most organizations assume. Below, they break down how leading organizations are restructuring for AI: what belongs at the center, what should be embedded in the business and how executive teams can assign clear ownership without slowing innovation.

expert panel

AI agents are no longer experimental tools tucked inside innovation labs. They are drafting contracts, recommending prices, screening candidates and reshaping how decisions are made across companies. As adoption accelerates, however, many organizations are discovering a sobering truth: Knowing how to use AI is not the same as knowing when not to. Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated group of technologists, executives and strategists shaping the future of applied AI—agree that the next frontier of AI maturity is literacy rooted in judgment. Training programs must now prepare employees not just to operate AI agents, but to question them, override them and escalate concerns when outputs conflict with human values, domain expertise or organizational risk. That concern is well founded: Organizations relying on unchecked automation face higher reputational and compliance risk, even when systems appear highly accurate. Similarly, confident but incorrect AI outputs—often called “hallucinations”—are becoming one of the biggest enterprise risks as generative AI scales. Against that backdrop, Senior Executive AI Think Tank members outline what effective AI literacy training must look like in practice—and why leaders must act now.

expert panel

The launch of the White House’s Genesis Mission represents a bold federal effort to leverage artificial intelligence for scientific discovery, national competitiveness and economic growth. Announced in November 2025 via executive order, the Genesis Mission aims to create an integrated experimentation platform by linking federal datasets, high-performance computing and public-private partnerships to accelerate AI-driven breakthroughs across biotechnology, energy, semiconductors and more. As this national initiative unfolds, questions about equitable access, anti-competitive risk and inclusive governance have emerged from both industry and policy communities. Ensuring that smaller players—startups, academic labs and emerging innovators—have a fair seat at the table is not just an ethical imperative but a strategic one if the United States wants sustained innovation and economic vibrancy. Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—experts in machine learning, enterprise AI and AI strategy—offer frameworks and strategies that federal leaders can adopt to prevent the Genesis Mission from becoming a vehicle that reinforces incumbent dominance rather than broad-based innovation.

expert panel

As artificial intelligence advances at breakneck speed, the question of trust has become more urgent than ever. How do senior leaders ensure that innovation doesn’t outpace safety—and that every stakeholder, from customers to regulators and employees, retains confidence in rapidly evolving AI systems? Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated group of seasoned AI leaders and ethics experts—are confronting this challenge head-on. With backgrounds at Microsoft, Salesforce, Morgan Stanley and beyond, these executives are uniquely positioned to share practical, real-world strategies for building trust even in regulatory gray areas. And their insights come at a critical moment: A recent global study by KPMG found that only 46% of people worldwide are willing to trust AI systems, despite widespread adoption and optimism about AI’s benefits. That “trust gap” is more than just a perception issue—it’s a barrier to realizing AI’s full business potential. Against this backdrop, the Think Tank’s lessons are not theoretical, but actionable frameworks for leading organizations in a world where regulation lags, public concern mounts and the stakes for getting trust wrong have never been higher.