Richie Adetimehin

expert panel

For years, enterprise technology leaders have wrestled with a familiar dilemma: Embrace the speed and innovation of a vendor platform or invest in building enough internal capability to maintain strategic control. Generative AI has made that trade-off far more consequential. As organizations move beyond chatbots to autonomous agents that retrieve information, invoke tools and make decisions across business systems, the focus is increasingly on who controls the pathways connecting models, knowledge, applications and enterprise data.That challenge is driving renewed interest in customer-owned AI control planes—enterprise-managed gateways that sit between AI applications and the rapidly expanding ecosystem of models, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, agent hubs and knowledge sources. Rather than relying entirely on vendor-specific ecosystems, these architectures promise centralized governance, stronger security, greater architectural flexibility and the ability to adopt new AI capabilities without redesigning the entire technology stack. Yet they also introduce an important question: Does adding another layer simplify enterprise AI or simply shift complexity from vendors to internal engineering teams?Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank, a community of leaders shaping enterprise AI strategy across architecture, governance, cloud computing and digital transformation, largely agree that customer-owned control planes represent an important evolution—but only if organizations approach them with discipline. Below, they discuss why centralized gateways can help organizations reduce vendor lock-in without slowing innovation, what security and architecture teams need to see before they'll trust agentic AI at scale and why governance should be built into every model and tool interaction rather than bolted on later.

expert panel

When OpenAI unveiled Jalapeño, its first custom AI inference chip developed with Broadcom, the announcement represented more than a hardware milestone. It highlighted a broader shift in the AI industry: the race to make intelligence faster, more affordable and more accessible at scale. As the cost of running large language models declines, product leaders face a new question—not simply what AI can do, but what products become possible when intelligence is inexpensive enough to operate continuously.For much of the generative AI era, product teams have designed around scarcity. They have limited model usage, shortened context windows, reduced reasoning steps and carefully managed AI interactions because every inference call carries a cost. But as custom silicon and AI infrastructure improvements drive down those constraints, AI can move from an occasional feature users activate to an always-present capability embedded throughout workflows. Research from McKinsey & Company estimates that generative AI could create trillions of dollars in annual economic value, but capturing that opportunity will require organizations to integrate AI into core business processes rather than treat it as a standalone tool.Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank believe the next generation of AI products will not simply be faster versions of today’s copilots. Below, they explore how OpenAI’s Jalapeño chip could reshape product design, unlock previously uneconomical AI applications and redefine the competitive landscape for organizations building the next generation of intelligent products.

expert panel

The current AI conversation has been dominated by software. Organizations have raced to deploy chatbots, copilots and generative AI tools that promise to boost productivity, improve decision-making and automate knowledge work. But what happens when AI leaves the screen and enters the physical world?That future is already taking shape. AI-powered robots are moving beyond controlled factory environments and into warehouses, hospitals, retail operations and even homes. Companies including Amazon, Tesla and Figure AI are investing billions in autonomous systems capable of navigating complex environments, collaborating with humans and performing tasks that once required manual labor. At the same time, labor shortages, rising operating costs and demographic shifts are creating strong economic incentives for automation. According to the International Federation of Robotics, global demand for industrial robots has more than doubled over the past decade, with more than 4.6 million robots now operating in factories worldwide.Yet despite the excitement, fundamental questions remain unanswered: What milestone will signal that AI-powered robotics has evolved from a promising technology into a mainstream commercial reality? Will it be a breakthrough in capability? A dramatic reduction in cost? Regulatory approval? Or something less obvious?To explore these questions, we turned to members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank, a curated group of leaders and practitioners specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications. Below, they share the signals they believe executives should be watching and the conditions that will determine when AI-powered robotics truly crosses into the mainstream.

expert panel

Artificial intelligence is often framed as a race: faster models, bigger investments, larger datasets and more powerful infrastructure. But beneath the headlines lies a more consequential question for business leaders, policymakers and investors alike: Who gets to compete?A growing share of the AI ecosystem is controlled by a relatively small number of organizations with access to the world's largest compute resources, proprietary datasets and distribution channels. This means the debate is no longer simply about what AI can do but about whether the next wave of innovation will emerge from an open marketplace of ideas or from a handful of dominant ecosystems.To explore that question, we asked members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated community of leaders specializing in machine learning, generative AI, digital transformation and enterprise AI applications—what single rule they would change to improve AI competition.While their recommendations differ, a clear theme emerges: The future of AI should be shaped by innovation, trust and customer value rather than lock-in, opacity or concentrated control. The following insights offer a timely look at how technology and business leaders believe a more competitive—and in many cases safer—AI ecosystem can be built.

expert panel

For many organizations, AI training has become synonymous with productivity. Employees learn how to write better prompts, automate routine tasks and generate content faster than ever before. But as AI becomes embedded in everyday business decisions, a more important question is emerging: Are organizations teaching people how to use AI, or how to use it responsibly?AI can generate recommendations, summarize information and accelerate workflows, but it cannot assume accountability for outcomes. That responsibility still belongs to people. Yet many training programs spend far more time on tools than on judgment, ethics, governance and critical thinking.This concern is reflected in Deloitte's “The State of Generative AI in the Enterprise” research, which found that regulatory compliance concerns, risk management challenges and the lack of governance models rank among the leading barriers to scaling AI initiatives. As organizations move beyond experimentation, the challenge is no longer simply getting employees to use AI—it is ensuring they can use it responsibly.To explore what modern AI fluency should look like, we turned to members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank, a curated community of experts in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise transformation. Their perspectives offer a roadmap for moving beyond AI tool proficiency and building the judgment, oversight and responsible-use practices that enable organizations to create lasting value from AI.

expert panel

As generative AI reshapes industries from media and marketing to software development and healthcare, one question is becoming impossible for enterprises, policymakers and technology providers to ignore: Who should benefit when AI systems are trained on human-created content?That debate has intensified as courts and regulators scrutinize how AI models are built, how synthetic media is distributed and whether creators deserve compensation when their work contributes to commercial AI products. Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated group of experts specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications—say the future of AI depends on building sustainable systems that balance innovation with accountability, transparency and trust.Lawsuits and copyright disputes over AI training data have accelerated globally, while companies such as Adobe continue advocating for licensed datasets and provenance frameworks designed to verify content authenticity. At the same time, enterprise adoption of generative AI continues to surge, with a McKinsey study on the state of AI finding that organizations are rapidly increasing investments in generative AI initiatives despite ongoing governance concerns.The challenge now facing the industry is not simply whether AI companies should compensate creators, but how to build systems that make compensation, transparency and innovation sustainable at scale. Below, Think Tank members outline what that future could look like—from collective licensing models and provenance standards to creator opt-in frameworks, enterprise governance strategies and new approaches to trust in the age of generative AI.