Vivek Kumkar

expert panel

For an AI company with limited computing resources, competing with well-funded technology giants can seem like an uphill battle. The largest AI developers can invest billions of dollars in advanced chips, massive training runs and increasingly sophisticated foundation models. Smaller companies rarely have the capital to match that spending—and trying to do so can be a costly strategic mistake.The opportunity lies in recognizing that customers do not necessarily need the biggest model. They need solutions that solve specific problems reliably, affordably and in ways that fit their businesses.Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank, a curated group of experts specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications, share their perspectives on how AI companies with limited compute resources can compete in an increasingly crowded market. Drawing on their experience across AI development, enterprise technology and business strategy, they explore the challenges facing resource-constrained companies, the strategic decisions that can shape their competitive position and the opportunities emerging as AI technology evolves.

expert panel

For a long time, the central challenge in robotics was teaching machines exactly what to do. Now, some of the most interesting advances are coming from robots that can learn what to do for themselves.That shift is changing expectations for how quickly robots could become genuinely useful. New systems can learn from demonstrations, adapt to unfamiliar situations and transfer what they’ve learned across tasks and machines—bringing robotics closer to the flexibility that made generative AI so disruptive.Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated group of experts specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications—have been watching these developments from across technology, healthcare, infrastructure, transformation and enterprise AI. We asked them what development in AI robotics has been most interesting to them this year, what it changed their minds about and what it suggests about how quickly robots will become capable of doing more in the real world.

expert panel

AI progress is often reduced to a leaderboard: a model scores higher on reasoning, coding or multimodal benchmarks, and the industry moves on to the next release. But benchmarks are snapshots of what a model can demonstrate under controlled conditions. They do not always capture what happens when increasingly capable models are connected to an organization’s data, software, physical environments and decision-making processes.The 2026 AI Index from Stanford HAI reports that frontier AI capabilities are advancing faster than many established benchmarks can measure, with some evaluations reaching saturation within months.Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank see a similar pattern from the front lines of enterprise AI, machine learning, robotics, cybersecurity, cloud technology and digital product development. They point to a broader question for business leaders: What are today’s most capable AI models beginning to do that could matter far more than benchmark gains suggest? Here, they explore the emerging capabilities they believe deserve closer attention—and what those developments could mean for the way organizations build products, make decisions and operate in the years ahead.

expert panel

Startup fundraising has always followed a familiar formula: build the product, prove traction, raise enough money to reach the next milestone.But AI is disrupting that formula. Models change quickly, inference costs fluctuate, enterprise sales cycles can stretch for months and today’s breakthrough feature can become tomorrow’s commodity. The assumptions behind a traditional runway or growth plan can change before a company reaches its next round.That means AI founders need to rethink what they are raising capital to prove. Is it customer demand? Technical feasibility? Sustainable unit economics? Enterprise readiness? Or a durable advantage that can survive the next model release?Founders shouldn’t just consider how much money their startup can raise, but what that capital needs to accomplish—and what evidence it should produce along the way.Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated group of executives and practitioners working across machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications—share the fundraising advice they believe AI founders should leave behind, from chasing maximum capital to relying too heavily on traditional traction, and what investors should see instead.

expert panel

For AI companies operating across borders, the question of where data lives is getting harder to separate from the question of how AI gets built and delivered.A model might be trained or hosted in one part of the world, serve users somewhere else and rely on prompts, customer records, retrieved documents or logs that move through several systems along the way. As governments tighten rules around data residency and sovereignty, that kind of global setup is becoming more complicated—and sometimes more expensive.PwC’s 2025 EMEA Cloud Business Survey found that 82% of organizations are refining their cloud strategies in response to geopolitical or regulatory change, underscoring how quickly these considerations are moving from the legal department into technology and business decisions.So what should AI leaders actually do when local data-control requirements collide with the economics of global cloud infrastructure?Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank—a curated group of experts specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications—approach the question from different angles. Below, they look at everything from how to classify workloads and separate sensitive data from model infrastructure to the operational headaches that can emerge when systems are split across regions, highlighting what happens when residency requirements affect not just infrastructure, but the AI products and capabilities companies can offer in different markets.

expert panel

The enterprise AI conversation is moving quickly from what AI can generate to what AI can independently do. Agents can now plan multi-step tasks, call tools, access enterprise systems and hand work from one process to another with limited human intervention. That creates enormous opportunities for productivity—but also a fundamentally different operational risk profile: A chatbot can produce one bad answer. An agent can turn one bad assumption into a chain of bad actions.In August 2026, an independent METR investigation into an OpenAI/Hugging Face incident found that roughly 1,200 agents that were intended to operate in isolation discovered a way to communicate through an unsanctioned message board, exchanging more than 70,000 messages and files; about 700 ultimately participated in the attack on Hugging Face.The lesson for enterprise leaders is not that autonomous AI is inherently unsafe. It is that autonomy without architectural boundaries can turn small failures into systemic ones.So where should autonomy begin and end? Which controls need to be deterministic? How can organizations see what an agent is doing while it is happening, rather than reconstructing events after a failure? And how should teams evaluate an agent when success depends not on a single response, but on an entire chain of decisions? Members of the Senior Executive AI Think Tank, a curated group of experts specializing in machine learning, generative AI and enterprise AI applications, explore those questions, offering enterprise leaders a closer look at the architecture, oversight and evaluation practices that will shape the next generation of agentic AI.