Jonathan H. Westover

expert panel

The question of who owns an employee's career sounds simple. In practice, it has fractured countless workplace relationships, stalled promising careers and quietly cost organizations some of their best people. As labor markets shift and employee expectations evolve, the stakes of getting it wrong have never been higher. Research from Gallup's 2025 American Job Quality Study, which surveyed more than 18,000 U.S. workers, found that one in four American employees report lacking opportunities for career advancement at work—a gap that drives disengagement, job searching and turnover.Members of the Senior Executive HR Think Tank, a curated group of human resources leaders, recruiters, strategists and organizational consultants, have spent years working at the intersection of this tension. Their consensus: Career ownership is not a binary choice between employee and employer. It is a shared responsibility—but one in which each party plays a distinct, non-negotiable role. When either side fails to show up, the whole system breaks down.The following insights explore where those lines should fall, what happens when they blur and what leaders can do to build a workplace culture where careers, and the people in them, actually thrive.

expert panel

Most companies list their values on a wall. Few teach their hiring managers how to find those values in a candidate. Members of the Senior Executive HR Think Tank share how to move values-based interviewing from a theoretical concept to a repeatable, accountable practice that protects culture and improves hiring outcomes.The statistics are hard to ignore. The U.S. Department of Labor estimates a bad hire costs at least 30% of that employee's first-year salary, and research from SHRM puts the figure considerably higher for senior roles, reaching up to 200% of annual compensation. Yet organizations continue to make the same mistake: they invest in articulating their values but stop short of training their people to actually interview for them.Values-based interviewing is the practice of structuring candidate conversations around observable behavioral evidence of core organizational values—not vague personality impressions or whether someone "seems like a good fit." When done well, it reduces costly turnover, mitigates bias and builds more cohesive, high-performing teams. When it is done poorly—or skipped entirely—the consequences compound quickly.Members of the Senior Executive HR Think Tank—a curated community of senior HR leaders, practitioners and consultants—offer their most effective approaches to closing this gap, and translating values from posters into practice.

expert panel

Leadership style has always influenced workplace culture, but in today’s business environment, toxic or unsustainable leadership behaviors are increasingly being recognized as measurable business risks rather than interpersonal challenges alone. From disengagement and burnout to turnover, innovation loss and declining customer experience, organizations are paying a growing price when unhealthy leadership behaviors go unchecked.Members of the Senior Executive HR Think Tank say the impact extends far beyond morale. These HR and leadership experts explain that toxic leadership creates operational drag, weakens trust, suppresses discretionary effort and ultimately undermines long-term business performance in ways many organizations underestimate until the damage is already visible.

expert panel

Members of the HR Think Tank share how organizations can communicate succession plans with greater transparency, fairness and trust—without creating internal competition, disengagement or political tension.Executive succession planning has become more visible—and more scrutinized—as organizations face leadership turnover, talent shortages and increased employee expectations around career growth. Recent SHRM reporting notes that succession planning is becoming increasingly urgent as organizations navigate leadership turnover, evolving workforce expectations and long-term talent continuity. Yet while most organizations recognize the importance of succession planning, many still struggle with how openly those plans should be communicated internally. Members of the Senior Executive HR Think Tank say the answer is not secrecy, but structured transparency. From clarifying leadership criteria to creating visible development pathways, these experts explain how organizations can communicate succession plans in ways that strengthen trust, reduce workplace friction and reinforce long-term business continuity.

expert panel

Members of the HR Think Tank explain what recent waves of executive turnover reveal about culture, accountability, leadership fit and organizational alignment—and what today’s C-suite leaders must do differently to build trust, resilience and long-term performance.Executive turnover has become one of the defining business stories of recent years. Across industries, organizations are replacing senior leaders at a pace that reflects more than market volatility or economic uncertainty. Increasingly, these departures point to deeper issues involving culture, leadership fit, accountability and organizational trust.A recent HR Executive report on record CEO turnover notes that boards are reevaluating not only who earns top leadership roles but also which leadership traits matter most during periods of uncertainty and transformation. Adaptability, cultural leadership and long-term organizational trust are taking priority alongside traditional executive credentials.For many organizations, the definition of effective leadership has evolved. Technical expertise and past performance still matter, but leaders are now also expected to navigate complexity, align teams around strategy and model values-based leadership under pressure. As companies navigate ongoing workplace transformation, executive turnover is becoming less about isolated leadership failures and more about broader organizational alignment and resilience.Members of the Senior Executive HR Think Tank bring firsthand experience to this conversation. These HR, leadership and culture experts work closely with organizations navigating executive transitions, talent strategy and workplace change. Their insights point to a clear conclusion: executive turnover is no longer just a governance issue. It is a leadership diagnostic.

expert panel

Members of the HR Think Tank share what they would eliminate if work could be rebuilt from scratch—from performative meetings and outdated performance reviews to rigid schedules and bureaucracy—and explain how organizations can design more productive, human-centered workplaces for the future.For decades, organizations have modernized technology faster than they have modernized work itself. Many companies now operate with advanced collaboration tools, AI-enabled systems and global talent networks, yet employees still navigate processes and expectations built for a far different era. Meetings dominate calendars. Email drives fragmented communication. Performance reviews often feel disconnected from development. Productivity is frequently measured by visibility rather than outcomes.That disconnect is becoming harder to ignore as leaders confront burnout, disengagement and shifting workforce expectations. Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends report highlights that organizations are increasingly being forced to rethink how work is designed as employees demand greater flexibility, purpose, sustainability and trust in the workplace.Members of the Senior Executive HR Think Tank, a collective of experienced HR leaders, strategists and workplace experts, realize the future of work will not be shaped merely by adding new tools to old systems. Instead, they believe organizations must eliminate outdated structures that quietly drain performance, trust and creativity. Their insights reveal a common theme: Many of the practices companies defend most aggressively may be the very ones holding people back.